Can You Sell an ADU Separately in California? AB 1033 and the Peninsula Opt-In Map
Yes, but only where the local jurisdiction has opted in. AB 1033, effective January 1, 2024, lets California cities and counties pass a local ordinance allowing an ADU to be sold separately from the primary home as a condominium. Without that local ordinance, the old rule still applies and the ADU cannot be conveyed on its own. As of July 2026, San Jose is the only Bay Area jurisdiction that has adopted one: it opted in during July 2024 and closed the first ADU condo sale in California in August 2025, a 749 sq ft unit near downtown that went for $530,000. No San Mateo County city and no Peninsula city in Santa Clara County (Palo Alto, Mountain View, Sunnyvale, Menlo Park, Redwood City, and the rest) has opted in, so on most of the Peninsula a sellable ADU is an underwriting option to watch, not a base case.
What AB 1033 Actually Changed
Before 2024, California ADU law came with a hard string attached: the ADU could not be sold or conveyed separately from the primary residence. You could build it, rent it, and house family in it, but at sale the lot moved as one asset with one buyer. AB 1033, signed in October 2023 and effective January 1, 2024, removed that prohibition conditionally. A city or county may now adopt a local ordinance allowing ADUs to be sold separately from the main home as condominiums, formed under the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act and mapped in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act.
The word doing the work in that sentence is may. AB 1033 grants cities the power and changes nothing on its own. No ordinance, no separate sale. That makes the practical question for a Peninsula developer not “what does state law allow?” but “has this specific jurisdiction opted in?” And the honest answer is that almost none have.
Who Has Opted In, And Who Has Not
Statewide, the confirmed opt-in list as of July 2026 is three jurisdictions: San Jose, Santa Monica, and unincorporated San Diego County. Los Angeles, Sacramento, Oakland, and Long Beach are studying ordinances but have not adopted. Here is how that maps onto the markets we track:
| Jurisdiction | AB 1033 status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| San Jose | Opted in | Ordinance adopted July 2024, the first large city in the state. First ADU condo approved and sold August 2025. |
| San Mateo County cities (Menlo Park, Palo Alto’s neighbors north through Daly City) | Not opted in | No city in the county has adopted an ordinance. ADUs remain tied to the primary home at sale. |
| Unincorporated San Mateo County | Not opted in | Same rule as the cities: no separate conveyance. |
| Peninsula Santa Clara County (Palo Alto, Mountain View, Sunnyvale, Cupertino, Los Gatos, Saratoga) | Not opted in | No adoption as of July 2026 despite San Jose next door proving the mechanics. |
| Elsewhere in California | Santa Monica, unincorp. San Diego County | Santa Monica adopted in 2025; unincorporated San Diego County’s ordinance took effect April 2026. LA, Sacramento, Oakland, and Long Beach are studying it. |
Status as of July 2026. Opt-ins are moving through councils around the state, so confirm with the local planning department before you underwrite a separate-sale exit anywhere.
The Conversion Process In An Opted-In City
Where an ordinance exists, an ADU condo is a real subdivision of airspace, not a paperwork formality. The San Jose playbook, which tracks the statute’s requirements, looks like this:
- Planning approval under the local ordinance. The ADU must be permitted and must meet whatever conditions the city attached to its opt-in. San Jose conveys qualifying units through a map recorded via its Public Works department.
- A condominium plan or map. A licensed surveyor or civil engineer draws the unit boundaries and common area, and the plan records in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act. This is the document that turns one parcel into two sellable units.
- Separate utilities. The ADU needs independently metered water, sewer, gas, and electric service, and the owner must give written notice to each utility provider of the creation and conveyance of the separate unit. If you are building new, stubbing separate services costs far less than retrofitting them later.
- A safety inspection. The unit must pass a safety inspection before the condominium plan records.
- Lienholder consent. Any lender with a deed of trust on the property must consent before the map records. On a construction loan this is a real gating item: raise it with your lender before you close the loan, not after the building is up.
- CC&Rs and an HOA.The units become a common interest development under Davis-Stirling, which means recorded CC&Rs and a homeowners association to manage shared elements, even when the “association” is two owners on one former single-family lot.
- Record and sell. Once the plan records, the ADU gets its own deed and title and can close to its own buyer.
Published estimates put the legal and filing side at roughly $15,000 to $30,000, before any utility-separation construction. The encouraging data point: San Jose’s first conversion reportedly moved through approvals in about 60 days. This is a process a spec builder can schedule, not an open-ended entitlement fight.
Check Teardown Probability
Enter any Peninsula address to instantly calculate its hidden developer value.
What A Sellable ADU Does To The ROI Math
Here is why this matters more than the short opt-in list suggests. Today, an ADU’s contribution to your exit is whatever an appraiser credits it on a single combined sale, which in practice means capitalized rent or a lump-sum adjustment, and both routinely come in below what the unit cost to build. The whole-property buyer pool also thins out at the top: the family paying for the main house often assigns near-zero value to a second kitchen in the backyard.
AB 1033 replaces that appraisal haircut with a second, independent exit. The San Jose comp is the proof: 749 sq ft cleared $530,000, about $707 per square foot, sold to an entry-level owner-occupant rather than valued off rent. Against detached-ADU all-in build costs that typically run well below that per foot, the spread is a development margin on a unit that used to be a cost-recovery question. Three consequences for how you underwrite:
- Teardown residuals move. If a rebuild can carry a detached ADU and the jurisdiction allows a condo exit, the project’s achievable finished value is house plus a separately-priced unit, not house plus an appraisal adjustment. Run it through the same inequality as any scrape-and-rebuild in the teardown pencil test: a second exit raises the right side, which raises the residual land value you can pay and still hit margin.
- It is a lot-split outcome without a lot split. An SB 9 urban lot split gets you two fee-simple exits, but only on parcels that clear the size, geometry, and owner-occupancy screens. AB 1033 condoization reaches a similar economic result on lots that fail those screens, at the price of an HOA and a thinner condo-buyer financing pool. Screen parcels for both paths: the SB 9 lot-split screener flags where the fee-simple route works, and where it does not, the condo route is the fallback to watch.
- Build separable now, even where you cannot sell yet.On the Peninsula outside San Jose, the rational move is optionality: if you are building an ADU anyway, separate meters, a detached footprint, and clean access cost little at construction time and make the unit convertible the day the city opts in. An ADU plumbed through the main house’s panel and water line is a retrofit project first and a condo second.
The honest caveats: one closed comp is a thin market, condo financing for sub-800 sq ft units is choppier than SFR financing, a mandatory HOA on a two-unit lot can drag slightly on the primary home’s resale, and an opt-in that has not happened is not an exit you can bank. Underwrite the separate sale as the base case in San Jose and as unpriced upside everywhere else on the Peninsula.
Finding The Parcels This Applies To
The lots where this option is worth real money share a profile: room for a detached unit, favorable setbacks, and a submarket where entry-level demand supports condo pricing. Our ADU feasibility screener ranks active San Mateo and Santa Clara County listings by exactly that buildability signal, and the SB 9 screener covers the parallel lot-split path. For the acquisition side of the same trade, the residual land value model is where a second exit shows up as a bigger number you can pay for the dirt.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can you sell an ADU separately from the main house in California?
Only in jurisdictions that have opted into AB 1033 by passing a local ordinance. The law took effect January 1, 2024, and lets cities and counties allow ADUs to be sold as condominiums, separate from the primary residence. It is opt-in, not automatic: in a city with no ordinance, the prior rule still applies and the ADU stays tied to the main house at sale.
Which Bay Area cities have opted into AB 1033?
As of July 2026, San Jose is the only one. It adopted its ordinance in July 2024, the first large California city to do so, and approved the first ADU condominium in the state in August 2025. Statewide, the confirmed opt-in list is short: San Jose, Santa Monica, and unincorporated San Diego County, with Los Angeles, Sacramento, Oakland, and Long Beach studying it. Verify with the local planning department before underwriting, because the list changes.
Can I sell my ADU separately in Palo Alto, Menlo Park, or San Mateo County?
Not as of July 2026. No San Mateo County jurisdiction and no Peninsula city in Santa Clara County has adopted an AB 1033 opt-in ordinance, so an ADU there cannot be sold separately from the primary home. The nearest jurisdiction where it is legal is San Jose. If a Peninsula city opts in later, conversions of already-permitted ADUs would become possible, which is one reason to build the ADU to a separable standard now.
What did the first AB 1033 ADU condo sell for?
The first ADU condominium in California closed in San Jose in August 2025 for $530,000. It was a new-construction 749 sq ft, two-bedroom, one-bath detached unit near downtown, roughly $707 per square foot, developed by AlphaX RE Capital, and the condo-conversion approvals reportedly took about 60 days. That single comp is the clearest evidence yet that a small ADU can exit at owner-occupant pricing rather than capitalized-rent value.
How is AB 1033 different from an SB 9 lot split?
SB 9 divides the land itself: an urban lot split creates two fee-simple parcels, with no HOA, but it carries an owner-occupancy affidavit, minimum lot-size and geometry rules, and works only on parcels that qualify. AB 1033 leaves the lot intact and creates condominium airspace units instead, so it can work on parcels that fail SB 9 screens, but it requires the city to have opted in, plus an HOA, a condo plan, and separate utilities. They are complementary exits, not substitutes.
What does converting an ADU to a sellable condo actually require?
In an opted-in city: planning approval under the local ordinance, a recorded condominium plan or map prepared by a licensed surveyor or engineer, separate metered utilities for the unit, a safety inspection before the plan records, written notice to utility providers, consent from any lender holding a lien on the property, and CC&Rs with a homeowners association formed under the Davis-Stirling Act, even for just two units. Budget roughly $15,000 to $30,000 in legal and filing costs on top of any utility-separation work.
Screen for ADU-ready lots now
The opt-in map will change. The lots that can carry a sellable ADU are on the market today. Rank Peninsula listings by ADU buildability and SB 9 eligibility before the ordinance catches up.
Launch ADU Feasibility Screener →